Criminal Sentencing Essay Example for Free

Criminal Sentencing EssayA basic distrust in criminal sentencing is What are the purports of criminal sentencing? Scholars, too, reflect on the purposes of punishment. There are commonly iv identified purposesRetribution. The oldest but considered the most important purpose for sentencing is retaliation, that is, inflicting on an off sacker suffering comparable to that ca wontd by the offense. An act of social vengeance, retribution is grounded in a view of society as a form of moral balance. When criminality upsets this balance, punishment exacted in comparable measure restores the moral order, as suggested in the biblical dictum An eye for an eye. While contemporary critics of retribution sometimes charge that this policy lacks the force to put right the offender, it still remains a strong on the buttonification for punishment.A second purpose for sentencing, intimidation amounts to the assay to discourage criminality through punishment. Initially, deterrence arose a s the banner of elucidateers hitchking to end what they saw as excessive punishments based on retribution. Critics asked, Why put someone to death for stealing if that crime could be discouraged with a prison condemn? As the concept of deterrence in sentencing gained widespread acceptance, action and physical mutilation of criminals were gradually replaced by milder forms of punishment such as imprisonment. There are two types of deterrence, specialized deterrence demonstrates to the individual offender that crime does non pay while in general deterrence, thepunishment of one person serves as an example to others.Rehabilitation. The third purpose for sentencing, rehabilitation, involves reforming the offender to preclude subsequent offenses. It resembles deterrence by motivating the offender to conform. But rehabilitation emphasizes constructive improvement while deterrence and retribution make the offender suffer. In addition, while retribution demands that the punishment fi t the crime, rehabilitation focuses on the distinctive problems of each offender. Thus identical offenses would call for similar acts of retribution but different programs of rehabilitation.Social protection. A final purpose for sentencing is social protection, or rendering an offender incapable of further offenses either temporarily through incarceration or permanently by execution. Like deterrence, social protection is a sharp-witted approach to punishment and seeks to protect society from crime. The different forms of sentencing used in different jurisdictions involve institutional sanctionstime to be served in prison or jail and noninstitutional sanctionsfines and forfeiture of the proceeds of crime, and serve of the judgment of conviction in the community in the form of probation or parole. Recently the arsenal of punishments has been considerably overstated by the creation of mixed sanctions and alternatives to either institutional or noninstitutional sanctions. The fol lowing are the word form of options for sentencingDeath penalty. In thirty-six states (as well as the federal courts), courts may impose a sentence of death for whatsoever offense designated a capital crime, for example, first-degree murder.Incarceration. The defendant may be sentenced to serve a end point in a local jail, state prison, or federal prison.Probation. The defendant may be sentenced to a period of probationary supervision within the community.Split sentence. A judge may offend the sentence mingled with a period of incarceration and a period of probation.Restitution. An offender may be required to digest financial reimbursement to cover the cost of a victims losses.Community gain. An offender may be required to spend a period of time performing public service work.Fine. An offender may be required to pay a certain sum of money as a penalty and/or as an alternative to or in conjunction with incarceration.This leads us to the bordering question, What are some refor ms that have been proposed? A recent reform growing out of the victims rights movement in the sentencing process is the consideration of storys by the victim, noticen as victim impact statements (VIS).Twenty-six states have mandated the use of VIS in criminal cases, while another twenty-two states have adopted so-called victim bills of rights that include recognition of the right of a victim to present a VIS. In the VIS, the victim provides a statement about the extent of economic, physical, or psychological harm suffered as a result of the victimization. The victim overly can make a recommendation about the type of sentence an offender should receive. Usually the VIS is corporal into the pre-sentence investigation report written by the probation officer.Research has revealed that a judges choice of a sentence is influenced much more by legal considerations than by victim preferences in cases where VIS has been presented (McGarrell, 1999).The third reform proposal is revitalisi ng judge. Restorative justice has been a feature of justice systems for a long time, though it was little used until a group of criminologists in the United States and the Commonwealth countries brought the image back to life. The term restorative justice was virtually unknown a decade ago, and it is still in search of a commonly accepted meaning. Yet, the literature related to this subject has grown rapidly, so that we venture to define it in terms offered by Howard Zehr, published in a symposium of The JusticeProfessional, entitled Criminology as Peacemaking. Zehr provides contrasting paradigms between the traditional, retributive sense of justice and the newly emerging (or reemerging) restorative sense of justice. If the proposed reform of restorative justice were adopted, where would that leave us with respect to the traditional aims or justifications of criminal justice?As to retribution (or just desserts), we would still be limited to never imposing an obligation (sanction) that outweighs the harm done.As to incapacitation, even the staunchest advocates of restorative justice recognize that some offenders are far too dangerous to be returned to the community and that their separation from the community is necessary. But the prison population could be vastly geldd.As to resocialization or rehabilitation, the very idea is built into restorative justice, which aims at restoring the community.Some of the current fill outs in federal sentencing according to the U.S. SentencingCommission at https//www.ussc.gov. are the followingThe issue on the amendment pertaining to offenses involving cocaine base (crack) and the amendment pertaining to certain criminal history rules, see 72 FR 28558 (May 21, 2007) 72 FR 51882 (September 11, 2007), should be applied retroactively to previously sentenced defendants.The issue of the legal Conference of the United States, the and the United States Sentencing Commission has decided to establish a standing victims advisory group pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 995 and Rule 5.4 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure. It was stated that the purpose of the advisory group is (1) to assist the Commission in carrying out its statutory responsibilities nether 28 U.S.C. 994(o) (2) to provide the Commission its views on the Commissions activities as they relate to victims of crime (3) to disseminate information regarding sentencing issues to organizations be by the advisory group and to other victims of crime and victims advocacy groups, as appropriate and (4) to perform any other functions related to victims of crime as the Commission requests. The victims advisory group will consist of not more than 9 members, each of whom may serve not more than two consecutive 3-year terms.The issue on New Yorks Rockefeller laws to curb the drug trade which directly contributed to a dramatic increase in the states prison population costing the state millions of dollars, but failing to impact drug trafficking. Accordi ng to a New York Times editorial, New York has made incremental changes to the Rockefeller laws in recent years, but has stopped absolutely of restoring judicial discretion.A governor-appointed commission charged with studying state sentencing practices, however, has produced a report calling for the end of indeterminate sentencing the process by which a judge imposes a minimum and a maximum sentence and the Parole Board decides when to release an offender. It further suggests that nonviolent offenders be considered for community-based treatment instead of prison. Finally, Gov. Elliot Spitzers commission recommends restoring prison-based procreational and training programs as a means of helping to lower recidivism rates.The website of the Sentencing Project at http//www.sentencingproject.org. mission is to incite reforms in sentencing law and practice, and alternatives to incarceration through their advocacy and research. Moreover, the Sentencing Project provides defense lawyers with sentencing advocacy training and to reduce the reliance on incarceration. Hence, the Sentencing Project has become the leader in the effort to bring national oversight to disturbing trends and inequities in the criminal justice system with a successful formula that includes the publication of modern research, aggressive media campaigns and strategic advocacy for policy reform.As a result of The Sentencing Projects research, publications and advocacy, many people know that this country is the worlds leader in incarceration, that one in three young black men is under control of the criminal justice system, that five million Americans cant vote because of felony convictions, and that thousands of women and children have lost welfare, education and housing benefits as the result of convictions for minor drug offenses. Thus, the Sentencing Project is dedicated to changing the way Americans commend about crime and punishment which coincide with the interests of the National Assoc iation of Sentencing Advocates.References McGarrell, E.F. Restorative Justice Conferences. Indianapolis, IN HudsonInstitute, 1999 Edmund F. McGarrell, harsh Crime through Police-Citizen Cooperation, American Outlook, Spring 1998, pp. 6567.The Sentencing Project at http//www.sentencingproject.org.U.S. Sentencing Commission Available at https//www.ussc.gov.Zehr, H. Justice as Restoration, Justice as Respect,The Justice Professional 11, nos. 12 (1998), pp. 7187.